XSMO vs. XSVM
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - XSMO tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index while XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.24%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
XSMO vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 20.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 15.24%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.32% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
XSVM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 18.82%
- 1Y
- 37.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
XSMO vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.23% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 20.98% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and XSVM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XSMO and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
XSVM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
XSMO
XSVM
Industrials
XSMO
XSVM
Healthcare
XSMO
XSVM
Financial Services
XSMO
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
XSVM
Basic Materials
XSMO
XSVM
Real Estate
XSMO
XSVM
Communication Services
XSMO
XSVM
Utilities
XSMO
XSVM
Energy
XSMO
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
XSVM
XSMO vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.70 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 11.45 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -62.57% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -10.08% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -26.21% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -26.21% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -49.02% | +9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.73% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -11.54% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.25% | -0.62% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 4.63%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 4.63% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 12.28% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 18.54% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 22.55% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 25.07% | -0.94% |
XSMO vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than XSVM's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.53% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.82% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and XSVM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to XSVM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.24% vs 13.32% for XSVM. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.24% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.53% for XSMO.
XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer