PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 25.55% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 47.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 15.36%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
0.32%
1M
4.89%
YTD
25.55%
6M
21.13%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
15.36%

EEMO

1D
0.86%
1M
16.39%
YTD
47.80%
6M
47.38%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
25.55%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
47.80%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and EEMO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.43

The correlation between XSMO and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSMO vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
EEMO

Technology

22.1%
53.0%

Industrials

18.7%
7.5%

Healthcare

14.3%
2.3%

Financial Services

12.2%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

6.0%
9.9%

Real Estate

4.9%
0.3%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.2%

Utilities

3.5%
1.0%

Energy

2.9%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
0.6%

Technology

XSMO
22.1%
EEMO
53.0%

Industrials

XSMO
18.7%
EEMO
7.5%

Healthcare

XSMO
14.3%
EEMO
2.3%

Financial Services

XSMO
12.2%
EEMO
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
8.6%
EEMO
2.8%

Basic Materials

XSMO
6.0%
EEMO
9.9%

Real Estate

XSMO
4.9%
EEMO
0.3%

Communication Services

XSMO
4.5%
EEMO
1.2%

Utilities

XSMO
3.5%
EEMO
1.0%

Energy

XSMO
2.9%
EEMO
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.4%
EEMO
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSMOEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

4.25

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

15.61

-1.37

XSMO vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-48.47%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-14.75%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-26.06%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-34.03%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-46.57%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-20.12%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

4.01%

-1.38%

Volatility

XSMO vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 7.19%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 18.26%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

18.26%

-11.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

27.34%

-12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

29.13%

-9.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

20.60%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.15%

22.18%

+1.97%

XSMO vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than EEMO's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
2.01%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.66%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMO and EEMO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to XSMO (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.36% vs 9.66% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.66% for XSMO.

XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer