XSMO vs. CAFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG).
XSMO and CAFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. Both XSMO and CAFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSMO vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSMO vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 7.05% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 28.08% |
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 8.16% | 0.17% | 6.95% | 20.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 8.16% return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
CAFG
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSMO vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
CAFG
XSMO vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSMO | CAFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.69 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.11 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.14 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.07 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | 4.10 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSMO | CAFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.69 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.62 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and CAFG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSMO vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than CAFG's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and CAFG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | CAFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -23.66% | -34.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -13.08% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.59% | -2.97% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -5.81% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.40% | -0.16% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) have volatilities of 7.71% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | CAFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 7.37% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 13.26% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 21.20% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 19.75% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 19.75% | +4.30% |