XPP vs. CXSE
XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) are both China Equities funds - XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%) while CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPP returned -7.40%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for CXSE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XPP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CXSE.
Performance
XPP vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -26.96% return, which is significantly lower than CXSE's -5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed CXSE with an annualized return of -7.40%, while CXSE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.47% annualized return.
XPP
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -34.75%
- YTD
- -26.96%
- 1Y
- -21.29%
- 3Y*
- 1.14%
- 5Y*
- -20.34%
- 10Y*
- -7.40%
CXSE
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -11.87%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- -8.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
XPP vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -26.96% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -5.56% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and CXSE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XPP and CXSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XPP vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPP
CXSE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XPP
CXSE
Basic Materials
XPP
-
CXSE
Communication Services
XPP
-
CXSE
Consumer Cyclical
XPP
-
CXSE
Consumer Defensive
XPP
-
CXSE
Energy
XPP
-
CXSE
Healthcare
XPP
-
CXSE
Industrials
XPP
-
CXSE
Real Estate
XPP
-
CXSE
Technology
XPP
-
CXSE
Utilities
XPP
-
CXSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
CXSE
XPP vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPP | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.10 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.58 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 1.07 | -2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPP vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than CXSE's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and CXSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -70.01% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.78% | -17.70% | -27.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.95% | -32.12% | -20.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.51% | -62.28% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | -70.01% | -19.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.67% | -49.48% | -31.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.01% | -27.98% | -20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.17% | 9.50% | +10.67% |
Volatility
XPP vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 12.70% compared to WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) at 6.87%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 6.87% | +5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.45% | 15.78% | +13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 22.21% | +17.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.76% | 32.34% | +30.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.77% | 28.76% | +26.01% |
XPP vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPP vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than CXSE's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.53% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.86% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPP and CXSE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPP has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to CXSE (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs CXSE's -70.01%.
On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 6.47% vs -7.40% for XPP. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 6.47% return vs -7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XPP.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.53% for CXSE.
XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 0.32% for CXSE.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPP and CXSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer