CXSE vs. PGJ
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and PGJ (Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while PGJ tracks the Halter USX China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXSE returned 6.78%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for PGJ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PGJ.
Performance
CXSE vs. PGJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than PGJ's -19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed PGJ with an annualized return of 6.78%, while PGJ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.41% annualized return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 1Y
- 12.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- -7.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
PGJ
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -22.79%
- YTD
- -19.66%
- 1Y
- -17.95%
- 3Y*
- -1.71%
- 5Y*
- -13.30%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
CXSE vs. PGJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -5.20% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | -19.66% | 13.66% | 5.91% | -2.38% | -24.50% | -42.87% | 54.24% | 32.18% | -29.51% | 60.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and PGJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CXSE and PGJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CXSE vs. PGJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
PGJ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
CXSE
PGJ
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
PGJ
Industrials
CXSE
PGJ
Communication Services
CXSE
PGJ
Healthcare
CXSE
PGJ
Financial Services
CXSE
PGJ
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
PGJ
Basic Materials
CXSE
PGJ
-
Real Estate
CXSE
PGJ
Energy
CXSE
PGJ
Utilities
CXSE
PGJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. PGJ — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
PGJ
CXSE vs. PGJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | PGJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.90 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.51 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | -1.11 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. PGJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, smaller than the maximum PGJ drawdown of -78.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and PGJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | PGJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -78.37% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -35.08% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | -35.08% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.28% | -66.94% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | -78.37% | +8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.29% | -69.37% | +20.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -31.88% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.33% | 16.15% | -6.82% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. PGJ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | PGJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 7.34% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 17.78% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 24.75% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 43.73% | -11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 36.73% | -7.98% |
CXSE vs. PGJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. PGJ - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than PGJ's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.53% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 3.32% | 3.38% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and PGJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to PGJ (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs PGJ's -78.37%.
On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 6.78% vs -0.41% for PGJ. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 6.78% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PGJ.
PGJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.53% for CXSE.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while PGJ tracks Halter USX China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.70% for PGJ.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and PGJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer