CXSE vs. FXI
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXSE returned 7.34%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for FXI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
CXSE vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 7.34%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 6M
- -2.68%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
FXI
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.43%
- 1Y
- -5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
CXSE vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.87% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -11.46% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and FXI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CXSE and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CXSE vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
FXI
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CXSE
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
FXI
Industrials
CXSE
FXI
Communication Services
CXSE
FXI
Healthcare
CXSE
FXI
Financial Services
CXSE
FXI
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
FXI
Basic Materials
CXSE
FXI
Real Estate
CXSE
FXI
Energy
CXSE
FXI
Utilities
CXSE
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
FXI
CXSE vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.30 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | -0.69 | +2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -72.68% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -17.91% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | -28.72% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | -54.94% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | -60.81% | -9.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.04% | -30.27% | -17.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.88% | -31.21% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 7.86% | +0.94% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.82%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.82% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 14.58% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 19.97% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 31.70% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 27.67% | +1.04% |
CXSE vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than FXI's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 2.06% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.02% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and FXI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FXI (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 7.34% vs 2.78% for FXI. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 7.34% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 2.02% for FXI.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.74% for FXI.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer