PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. CNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 32.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed CNXT with an annualized return of 7.34%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.97% annualized return.


CXSE

1D
-1.01%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-2.87%
6M
-2.68%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
7.34%

CNXT

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.71%
YTD
32.65%
6M
34.86%
1Y
114.59%
3Y*
25.66%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
6.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-2.87%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
32.65%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and CNXT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.65

The correlation between CXSE and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CXSE vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
CNXT

Technology

27.4%
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

24.6%
0.9%

Industrials

12.7%
42.7%

Communication Services

12.1%
1.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
5.4%

Financial Services

6.2%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Energy

0.4%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Technology

CXSE
27.4%
CNXT
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
24.6%
CNXT
0.9%

Industrials

CXSE
12.7%
CNXT
42.7%

Communication Services

CXSE
12.1%
CNXT
1.1%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.6%
CNXT
5.4%

Financial Services

CXSE
6.2%
CNXT
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
4.0%
CNXT
1.7%

Basic Materials

CXSE
3.2%
CNXT
4.6%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.8%
CNXT

-

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
CNXT

-

Utilities

CXSE
0.2%
CNXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXSECNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.54

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

9.44

-8.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

27.90

-26.00

CXSE vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CNXT Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and CNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and CNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSECNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-68.98%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-12.21%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-48.60%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

-61.21%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

-63.30%

-6.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.04%

-2.79%

-45.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.88%

-42.80%

+14.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

4.12%

+4.68%

Volatility

CXSE vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 6.86%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSECNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

11.13%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

21.46%

-6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.69%

31.71%

-10.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.33%

35.40%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.71%

31.72%

-3.01%

CXSE vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than CNXT's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.14%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
2.06%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXSE and CNXT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXT has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to CXSE (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs CNXT's -68.98%.

On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 7.34% vs 6.97% for CNXT. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 7.34% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.14% for CNXT.

CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.65% for CNXT.

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and CNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer