PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPP vs. ARGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPP vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -17.68% return, which is significantly lower than ARGT's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of -5.30%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


XPP

1D
-4.83%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
-17.68%
6M
-20.01%
1Y
-5.89%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
-20.12%
10Y*
-5.30%

ARGT

1D
-3.12%
1M
5.42%
YTD
3.65%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
26.82%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPP vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
-17.68%45.84%38.18%-34.77%-50.06%-40.45%7.07%24.88%-31.36%80.21%
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
3.65%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XPP and ARGT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.44

The correlation between XPP and ARGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XPP vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPP
ARGT

Financial Services

42.1%
13.7%

Basic Materials

-

13.3%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

26.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.9%

Energy

-

22.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

5.1%

Financial Services

XPP
42.1%
ARGT
13.7%

Basic Materials

XPP

-

ARGT
13.3%

Communication Services

XPP

-

ARGT
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XPP

-

ARGT
26.3%

Consumer Defensive

XPP

-

ARGT
6.9%

Energy

XPP

-

ARGT
22.2%

Healthcare

XPP

-

ARGT

-

Industrials

XPP

-

ARGT
8.3%

Real Estate

XPP

-

ARGT
1.3%

Technology

XPP

-

ARGT

-

Utilities

XPP

-

ARGT
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPP vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPP
XPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPP vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPPARGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

0.16

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

0.55

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.06

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.26

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.37

0.57

-0.94

XPP vs. ARGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the ARGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPP and ARGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPPARGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.16

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.84

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

0.56

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.30

-0.40

Drawdowns

XPP vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than ARGT's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and ARGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPARGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.90%

-61.68%

-28.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.60%

-22.97%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.95%

-28.46%

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.24%

-35.14%

-50.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.90%

-61.68%

-28.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.21%

-7.96%

-70.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.82%

-22.05%

-25.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

11.20%

+4.75%

Volatility

XPP vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) at 10.43%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPARGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.45%

10.43%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.79%

20.31%

+8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.27%

36.70%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.75%

31.92%

+30.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.91%

31.44%

+23.47%

XPP vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPP vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison

XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than ARGT's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.81%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
2.63%2.32%2.96%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.81%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPP and ARGT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPP has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to ARGT (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs ARGT's -61.68%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.46% vs -5.30% for XPP. On fees, ARGT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ARGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.46% return vs -5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARGT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XPP.

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.81% for ARGT.

XPP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 0.60% for ARGT.

ARGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPP and ARGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer