PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 16.98%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.


ARGT

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.05%
6M
-2.76%
YTD
4.47%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
26.91%
10Y*
16.98%
ALL TIME*
8.93%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.79M$13.38M$19.12M
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

ARGT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
4.47%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and VGT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2011

0.53

The correlation between ARGT and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARGT vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARGT
VGT

Consumer Cyclical

29.3%
0.1%

Energy

19.3%
0.3%

Financial Services

17.1%
0.5%

Utilities

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

9.5%
0.0%

Industrials

3.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Technology

-

98.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ARGT
29.3%
VGT
0.1%

Energy

ARGT
19.3%
VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

ARGT
17.1%
VGT
0.5%

Utilities

ARGT
9.7%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

ARGT
9.5%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

ARGT
3.9%
VGT
0.4%

Communication Services

ARGT
3.2%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

ARGT
3.1%
VGT

-

Real Estate

ARGT
1.6%
VGT

-

Healthcare

ARGT

-

VGT
0.0%

Technology

ARGT

-

VGT
98.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARGT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARGTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.94

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

5.23

-3.65

ARGT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-54.63%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.02%

-16.40%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-27.23%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.14%

-35.07%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.68%

-35.07%

-26.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-9.93%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-7.95%

-13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.36%

6.07%

+4.29%

Volatility

ARGT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) is 7.57%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that ARGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

8.42%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.08%

20.14%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.33%

24.28%

+13.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

25.83%

+6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

24.89%

+6.62%

ARGT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARGT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
1.08%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGT and VGT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to ARGT (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 16.98% for ARGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ARGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 16.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ARGT.

ARGT has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ARGT and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer