PortfoliosLab logo
XPP vs. TQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XPP and TQQQ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

XPP vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XPP:

0.56

TQQQ:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

XPP:

1.12

TQQQ:

0.68

Omega Ratio

XPP:

1.15

TQQQ:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

XPP:

0.36

TQQQ:

0.13

Martin Ratio

XPP:

1.30

TQQQ:

0.35

Ulcer Index

XPP:

24.02%

TQQQ:

22.32%

Daily Std Dev

XPP:

70.47%

TQQQ:

75.60%

Max Drawdown

XPP:

-89.90%

TQQQ:

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

XPP:

-76.54%

TQQQ:

-26.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -13.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -12.62%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 30.78% annualized return.


XPP

YTD

29.29%

1M

13.98%

6M

31.55%

1Y

39.27%

3Y*

-2.48%

5Y*

-11.56%

10Y*

-12.62%

TQQQ

YTD

-13.44%

1M

51.55%

6M

-11.85%

1Y

7.24%

3Y*

35.26%

5Y*

29.09%

10Y*

30.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

XPP vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XPP and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XPP vs. TQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XPP is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XPP is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XPP is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XPP is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XPP is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XPP is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TQQQ is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XPP vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPP and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

XPP vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than TQQQ's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
2.77%2.96%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.81%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
1.44%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.03%

Drawdowns

XPP vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XPP vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 11.80%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 16.23%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...