PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGT vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGT vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed EPU with an annualized return of 17.83%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.50% annualized return.


ARGT

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.08%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.82%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
35.03%
5Y*
28.03%
10Y*
17.83%

EPU

1D
0.35%
1M
9.50%
YTD
19.12%
6M
33.81%
1Y
84.77%
3Y*
47.09%
5Y*
26.11%
10Y*
14.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGT vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
6.99%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
19.12%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and EPU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.50

The correlation between ARGT and EPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARGT vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARGT
EPU

Consumer Cyclical

26.3%
4.1%

Energy

22.2%

-

Financial Services

13.7%
28.8%

Basic Materials

13.3%
52.7%

Industrials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
3.0%

Utilities

5.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
3.2%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Technology

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ARGT
26.3%
EPU
4.1%

Energy

ARGT
22.2%
EPU

-

Financial Services

ARGT
13.7%
EPU
28.8%

Basic Materials

ARGT
13.3%
EPU
52.7%

Industrials

ARGT
8.3%
EPU
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

ARGT
6.9%
EPU
3.0%

Utilities

ARGT
5.1%
EPU
2.8%

Communication Services

ARGT
2.9%
EPU
1.6%

Real Estate

ARGT
1.3%
EPU
3.2%

Healthcare

ARGT

-

EPU
1.2%

Technology

ARGT

-

EPU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGT vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGT vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGTEPUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

2.92

-2.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.72

3.31

-2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.46

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.27

-3.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.83

12.95

-12.12

ARGT vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGTEPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.92

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.05

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.62

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and EPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGTEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-60.62%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.10%

-20.85%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-20.85%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.14%

-35.59%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.68%

-50.97%

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-8.16%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.06%

-18.83%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.19%

6.88%

+4.31%

Volatility

ARGT vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) at 9.09%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGTEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

9.09%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

24.88%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.57%

29.25%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

25.10%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.43%

23.42%

+8.01%

ARGT vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARGT vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than EPU's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.79%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.37%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGT and EPU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to EPU (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs EPU's -60.62%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.83% vs 14.50% for EPU. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPU has been the lower-risk option at 9.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.79% for ARGT.

ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ARGT and 0.59% for EPU.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGT and EPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer