PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.83%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.


ARGT

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.08%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.82%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
35.03%
5Y*
28.03%
10Y*
17.83%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
6.99%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and VOO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.56

The correlation between ARGT and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARGT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARGT
VOO

Consumer Cyclical

26.3%
10.2%

Energy

22.2%
3.5%

Financial Services

13.7%
11.6%

Basic Materials

13.3%
1.8%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.9%

Utilities

5.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Technology

-

35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ARGT
26.3%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

ARGT
22.2%
VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

ARGT
13.7%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

ARGT
13.3%
VOO
1.8%

Industrials

ARGT
8.3%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ARGT
6.9%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

ARGT
5.1%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

ARGT
2.9%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

ARGT
1.3%
VOO
1.9%

Healthcare

ARGT

-

VOO
8.5%

Technology

ARGT

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGTVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

2.53

-2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.72

3.43

-2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.46

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.42

-3.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.83

15.95

-15.11

ARGT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.53

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.85

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.87

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.89

-0.58

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-33.99%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.10%

-8.90%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-18.69%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.14%

-24.52%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.68%

-33.99%

-27.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

0.00%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.06%

-3.69%

-18.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.19%

1.91%

+9.28%

Volatility

ARGT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

2.74%

+7.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

8.88%

+11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.57%

11.78%

+24.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

16.81%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.43%

18.01%

+13.42%

ARGT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARGT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.79%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGT and VOO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.83% vs 15.65% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.79% for ARGT.

ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ARGT and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer