XOVR vs. SPYG
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. XOVR is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.37%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XOVR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 12.43% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
SPYG
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $323.67M | $273.71M | $308.17M | |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
XOVR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 12.43% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and SPYG is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XOVR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOVR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOVR
SPYG
Communication Services
XOVR
SPYG
Healthcare
XOVR
SPYG
Financial Services
XOVR
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
SPYG
Industrials
XOVR
SPYG
Energy
XOVR
SPYG
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
SPYG
Real Estate
XOVR
-
SPYG
Utilities
XOVR
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
SPYG
XOVR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.24 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.78 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 6.45 | -6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -67.63% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -13.76% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -22.14% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -32.67% | -16.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -2.28% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -24.20% | +5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 3.78% | +7.75% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.35%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 6.35% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 14.96% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 18.23% | +5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 21.53% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 20.81% | +6.22% |
XOVR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to SPYG (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 13.61% vs 3.37% for XOVR. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer