XOVR vs. SPY
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. XOVR is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.14%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SPY. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
XOVR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -7.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -4.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B | |
| $31.56M | $37.54M | $108.44M |
XOVR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -7.65% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and SPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XOVR and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOVR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOVR
SPY
Communication Services
XOVR
SPY
Healthcare
XOVR
SPY
Financial Services
XOVR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
SPY
Industrials
XOVR
SPY
Energy
XOVR
SPY
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
SPY
Real Estate
XOVR
-
SPY
Utilities
XOVR
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
SPY
XOVR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.20 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 9.40 | -9.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -55.19% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -8.88% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -18.76% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -24.50% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -1.40% | -12.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -9.01% | -9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.50% | 2.08% | +9.42% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 3.58% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.94% | 10.14% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.40% | 12.89% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 17.18% | +9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 17.95% | +9.06% |
XOVR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and SPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.76% vs 3.14% for XOVR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer