XOVR vs. QQQ
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. XOVR is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.14%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XOVR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -7.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -4.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B | |
| $31.56M | $37.54M | $108.44M |
XOVR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -7.65% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and QQQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XOVR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOVR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOVR
QQQ
Communication Services
XOVR
QQQ
Healthcare
XOVR
QQQ
Financial Services
XOVR
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
QQQ
Industrials
XOVR
QQQ
Energy
XOVR
QQQ
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
QQQ
Real Estate
XOVR
-
QQQ
Utilities
XOVR
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
QQQ
XOVR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.88 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.00 | -6.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -82.97% | +26.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -11.96% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -22.77% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -35.12% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -7.69% | -6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -32.62% | +14.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.50% | 3.74% | +7.76% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.87% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.94% | 16.08% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.40% | 19.38% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 22.90% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 22.50% | +4.51% |
XOVR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to XOVR (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 3.14% for XOVR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer