PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. PLTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XOUT vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XOUT vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
-18.03%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%28.71%11.32%
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-4.16%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%10.87%9.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -18.03% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -4.16% return.


XOUT

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-18.03%
6M
-16.05%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*

PLTM

1D
3.79%
1M
-16.88%
YTD
-4.16%
6M
25.15%
1Y
95.35%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XOUT vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTPLTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.92

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

2.18

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

2.85

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.68

8.61

-7.93

XOUT vs. PLTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the PLTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and PLTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTPLTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.92

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.30

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.27

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and PLTM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XOUT vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither XOUT nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and PLTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTPLTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-42.32%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-34.52%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-34.68%

+3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.44%

-29.20%

+8.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-18.35%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

11.43%

-4.33%

Volatility

XOUT vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) is 6.74%, while GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a volatility of 16.47%. This indicates that XOUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XOUTPLTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

16.47%

-9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

45.52%

-31.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

49.91%

-26.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

32.39%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

30.82%

-7.65%