XOUT vs. QQQ
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOUT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 10.93%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XOUT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
XOUT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and QQQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XOUT and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOUT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
QQQ
Healthcare
XOUT
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
QQQ
Communication Services
XOUT
QQQ
Financial Services
XOUT
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
QQQ
Industrials
XOUT
QQQ
Basic Materials
XOUT
QQQ
Real Estate
XOUT
QQQ
Energy
XOUT
QQQ
Utilities
XOUT
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
QQQ
XOUT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.45 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.51 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 13.49 | -12.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.64 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.41 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -82.97% | +51.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -11.96% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -22.77% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -35.12% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.26% | -5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -32.79% | +24.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 3.11% | +6.14% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 4.49% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 12.10% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 15.94% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 22.38% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 22.29% | +0.94% |
XOUT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 10.93% for XOUT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer