XOUT vs. MGK
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOUT tracks the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index while MGK tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 10.93%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for MGK. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
XOUT vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than MGK's 10.01% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
XOUT vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 11.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and MGK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XOUT and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOUT vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
MGK
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
MGK
Healthcare
XOUT
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
MGK
Communication Services
XOUT
MGK
Financial Services
XOUT
MGK
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
MGK
Industrials
XOUT
MGK
Basic Materials
XOUT
MGK
Real Estate
XOUT
MGK
Energy
XOUT
MGK
-
Utilities
XOUT
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
MGK
XOUT vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.79 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 6.15 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.86 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.72 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -47.97% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -16.85% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -23.36% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -36.01% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -1.43% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -7.47% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 4.89% | +4.36% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 4.01%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 4.01% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 12.37% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 16.23% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 22.63% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 21.88% | +1.35% |
XOUT vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and MGK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs MGK's -47.97%.
On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 16.25% vs 10.93% for XOUT. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.05% for MGK.
MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer