XOUT vs. ILCB
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOUT tracks the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 10.93%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
XOUT vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
XOUT vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and ILCB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XOUT and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOUT vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
ILCB
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
ILCB
Healthcare
XOUT
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
ILCB
Communication Services
XOUT
ILCB
Financial Services
XOUT
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
ILCB
Industrials
XOUT
ILCB
Basic Materials
XOUT
ILCB
Real Estate
XOUT
ILCB
Energy
XOUT
ILCB
Utilities
XOUT
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
ILCB
XOUT vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.42 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.10 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 14.24 | -13.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.35 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -51.53% | +20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -9.09% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -19.05% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -25.47% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.67% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -6.24% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 1.97% | +7.28% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 2.88% | +4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 9.10% | +7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 12.02% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 17.13% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 18.16% | +5.07% |
XOUT vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and ILCB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 10.93% for XOUT. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer