XOUT vs. GQGU
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XOUT is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
XOUT vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 6.60% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOUT vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 8.16% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and GQGU is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
GQGU
XOUT vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -6.65% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -4.66% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -2.54% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility
XOUT vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 10.14% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 10.14% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 10.14% | +13.09% |
XOUT vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and GQGU have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer