XOP vs. CL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL).
XOP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006.
Performance
XOP vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XOP vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 39.04% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 8.75% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 39.04% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 5.87%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.
XOP
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 39.04%
- 6M
- 31.49%
- 1Y
- 35.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 18.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.87%
CL
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- -6.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
CL
XOP vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOP | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | -0.32 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | -0.32 | +1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.96 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | -0.32 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | -0.56 | +5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOP | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | -0.32 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.23 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.22 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.42 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and CL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XOP vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than CL's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.86% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.44% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
XOP vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and CL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -58.91% | -31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.81% | -20.74% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | -29.05% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | -29.05% | -53.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.01% | -18.68% | -16.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -11.22% | -31.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 11.72% | -4.39% |
Volatility
XOP vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 6.60%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 6.60% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.57% | 15.88% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.73% | 21.32% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.12% | 18.29% | +15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 19.51% | +20.78% |