XOP vs. GUSH
XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XOP returned 3.08%/yr vs -37.00%/yr for GUSH. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
XOP vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 42.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of 3.08%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -37.00% annualized return.
XOP
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 24.78%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
GUSH
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -18.97%
- YTD
- 42.86%
- 6M
- 44.72%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- -37.00%
XOP vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 23.78% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 42.86% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 129.94% | -97.38% | -52.68% | -74.28% | -40.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and GUSH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XOP and GUSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOP vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOP
GUSH
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XOP
GUSH
Basic Materials
XOP
GUSH
Communication Services
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Consumer Defensive
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Financial Services
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Healthcare
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Industrials
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Real Estate
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Technology
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Utilities
XOP
-
GUSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
GUSH
XOP vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOP | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.63 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 1.67 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOP vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -99.98% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.50% | -36.18% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.98% | -63.59% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | -73.64% | +38.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | -99.94% | +17.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.15% | -99.83% | +57.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.58% | -92.91% | +50.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 13.92% | -7.30% |
Volatility
XOP vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) is 9.19%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 18.38%. This indicates that XOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 18.38% | -9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 44.33% | -22.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 56.70% | -28.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 68.20% | -34.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 93.57% | -53.28% |
XOP vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOP vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than GUSH's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.75% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2.58% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, XOP and GUSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GUSH has higher volatility (18.38%) compared to XOP (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs GUSH's -99.98%.
On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.08% vs -37.00% for GUSH. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.08% return vs -37.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
XOP has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.
XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 1.17% for GUSH.
XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOP and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer