PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 42.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of 3.08%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -37.00% annualized return.


XOP

1D
1.50%
1M
-9.47%
YTD
23.78%
6M
24.78%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
3.08%

GUSH

1D
3.14%
1M
-18.97%
YTD
42.86%
6M
44.72%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
-37.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
23.78%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
42.86%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and GUSH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.99

The correlation between XOP and GUSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOP vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
GUSH

Energy

96.8%
96.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOP
96.8%
GUSH
96.8%

Basic Materials

XOP
3.2%
GUSH
3.2%

Communication Services

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Healthcare

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Industrials

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Real Estate

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Technology

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Utilities

XOP

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOPGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.63

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

1.67

+1.18

XOP vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOP vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-99.98%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-36.18%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-63.59%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-73.64%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-99.94%

+17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.15%

-99.83%

+57.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.58%

-92.91%

+50.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

13.92%

-7.30%

Volatility

XOP vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) is 9.19%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 18.38%. This indicates that XOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

18.38%

-9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.09%

44.33%

-22.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.36%

56.70%

-28.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

68.20%

-34.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.29%

93.57%

-53.28%

XOP vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOP vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than GUSH's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.75%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
2.58%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XOP and GUSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GUSH has higher volatility (18.38%) compared to XOP (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.08% vs -37.00% for GUSH. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.08% return vs -37.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.

XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 1.17% for GUSH.

XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer