PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 36.08% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 3.80%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


XOP

1D
1.35%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
36.08%
6M
26.81%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
3.80%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
36.08%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and XLE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.91

The correlation between XOP and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOP vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
XLE

Energy

97.2%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOP
97.2%
XLE
100.0%

Basic Materials

XOP
2.9%
XLE

-

Communication Services

XOP

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

XOP

-

XLE

-

Industrials

XOP

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

XOP

-

XLE

-

Technology

XOP

-

XLE

-

Utilities

XOP

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOPXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.75

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

10.92

-3.82

XOP vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOPXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.21

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.35

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.31

-0.25

Drawdowns

XOP vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-71.26%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

-12.05%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-20.14%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-26.04%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-66.81%

-15.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.40%

-6.15%

-30.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-17.98%

-24.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

4.14%

+1.76%

Volatility

XOP vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

8.25%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.64%

16.58%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.81%

20.53%

+7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

26.02%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.28%

29.59%

+10.69%

XOP vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOP vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.90%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOP and XLE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 3.80% for XOP. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.90% for XOP.

XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer