XOEF vs. TLT
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
XOEF vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.56% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- -2.03%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- -1.63%
XOEF vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 12.43% | 4.15% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.56% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and TLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
TLT
XOEF vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEF | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.25 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -48.35% | +40.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -40.61% | +38.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -13.82% | +12.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.07% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 9.66% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 15.85% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 14.90% | -2.17% |
XOEF vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEF vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than TLT's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and TLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.80% for XOEF.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while TLT is Government Bonds. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer