PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.56% return.


XOEF

1D
-1.83%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
-2.03%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*
-1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
12.43%4.15%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.56%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and TLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOEF vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEFTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.25

+1.24

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-48.35%

+40.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-40.61%

+38.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-13.82%

+12.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

Volatility

XOEF vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

9.66%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

15.85%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

14.90%

-2.17%

XOEF vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEF vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than TLT's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.60%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
0.80%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and TLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.80% for XOEF.

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while TLT is Government Bonds. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.15% for TLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer