PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. DIVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. DIVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly lower than DIVG's 16.49% return.


XOEF

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.24%
6M
8.68%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

DIVG

1D
-0.65%
1M
4.39%
6M
12.87%
YTD
16.49%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. DIVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and DIVG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.60

The correlation between XOEF and DIVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. DIVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF
XOEF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XOEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XOEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVG
DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. DIVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOEFDIVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.21

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

13.38

-3.86

XOEF vs. DIVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the DIVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEF and DIVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. DIVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum DIVG drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and DIVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFDIVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-14.95%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-5.13%

-2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-0.99%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-2.21%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.61%

+0.39%

Volatility

XOEF vs. DIVG - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFDIVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.40%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

7.69%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

10.94%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

13.14%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

13.14%

-0.38%

XOEF vs. DIVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVG's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOEF vs. DIVG - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than DIVG's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
3.24%3.15%4.08%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
1.06%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and DIVG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVG has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to XOEF (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEF dropped -7.66% vs DIVG's -14.95%.

On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 21.46% vs 18.97% for XOEF. On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 21.46% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DIVG.

DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.06% for XOEF.

XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.39% for DIVG.

DIVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and DIVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer