XOEF vs. DGRO
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
XOEF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 10.40% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
XOEF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 16.44% | 4.27% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 10.40% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and DGRO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRO
XOEF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -35.10% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -3.43% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 9.48% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 13.79% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 16.57% | -3.68% |
XOEF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than DGRO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.95% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.04% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.04% for XOEF.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer