PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT vs. EDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLT vs. EDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than EDV's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has outperformed EDV with an annualized return of -1.71%, while EDV has yielded a comparatively lower -3.40% annualized return.


TLT

1D
0.16%
1M
3.72%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.58%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
-1.61%
5Y*
-6.85%
10Y*
-1.71%

EDV

1D
0.56%
1M
6.18%
YTD
1.36%
6M
0.70%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
-4.93%
5Y*
-10.70%
10Y*
-3.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. EDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.92%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
1.36%0.65%-12.78%1.65%-39.15%-6.19%23.59%18.67%-3.40%13.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and EDV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.96

The correlation between TLT and EDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLT vs. EDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

EDV
EDV Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. EDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTEDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.06

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

0.35

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

0.78

+0.60

TLT vs. EDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the EDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and EDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLT vs. EDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum EDV drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and EDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTEDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-59.96%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-12.54%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-26.99%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-55.03%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-59.96%

+11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.73%

-53.49%

+13.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-23.50%

+9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

5.60%

-2.44%

Volatility

TLT vs. EDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.33%, while Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTEDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

3.54%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

9.83%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.51%

14.31%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

21.61%

-5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

19.82%

-4.91%

TLT vs. EDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EDV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLT vs. EDV - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than EDV's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
4.88%4.94%4.65%3.81%3.28%1.95%5.54%3.51%2.90%2.92%5.32%4.24%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.53%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TLT and EDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDV has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to TLT (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs EDV's -59.96%.

On 10-year performance, TLT leads with -1.71% vs -3.40% for EDV. On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TLT has performed better with a -1.71% return vs -3.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.53% for TLT.

TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.05% for EDV.

TLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and EDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer