PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


XOEF

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.07%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
13.92%4.15%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and VOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOEF vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEFVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.89

+0.77

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-33.99%

+26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.70%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-3.69%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

XOEF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

11.80%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.62%

16.81%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

18.01%

-5.39%

XOEF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
0.79%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and VOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.79% for XOEF.

XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer