XOEF vs. VOO
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XOEF tracks the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index while VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
XOEF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.25% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XOEF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 16.44% | 4.27% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.25% | 10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and VOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
XOEF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -33.99% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.19% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -3.68% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 12.49% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 16.92% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 18.00% | -5.11% |
XOEF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VOO's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.04% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and VOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.04% for XOEF.
XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer