PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLT vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed IEF with an annualized return of -1.63%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively higher 0.60% annualized return.


TLT

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
-2.03%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*
-1.63%

IEF

1D
-0.53%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-1.06%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
2.32%
5Y*
-1.22%
10Y*
0.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.56%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-1.06%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%0.99%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and IEF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002

0.92

The correlation between TLT and IEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLT vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTIEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.12

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

0.79

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

2.30

-1.36

TLT vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTIEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.68

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

-0.16

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.09

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.50

-0.24

Drawdowns

TLT vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than IEF's maximum drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-23.93%

-24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-4.07%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-7.74%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-21.40%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-23.93%

-24.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.61%

-11.70%

-28.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-5.35%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.39%

+1.68%

Volatility

TLT vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 1.53%. This indicates that TLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.53%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

3.38%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

4.76%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

7.71%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

6.62%

+8.28%

TLT vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TLT and IEF have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLT vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than IEF's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.92%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.60%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TLT and IEF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLT has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to IEF (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs IEF's -23.93%.

On 10-year performance, IEF leads with 0.60% vs -1.63% for TLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, IEF has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEF has performed better with a 0.60% return vs -1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT and IEF have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.92% for IEF.

TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index.

IEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer