XOEF vs. VTI
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XOEF returned 18.97% vs 19.88% for VTI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
XOEF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.90% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.24%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.57%
XOEF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 13.96% | 4.27% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.90% | 10.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and VTI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XOEF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
VTI
XOEF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.24 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 9.77 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -55.45% | +47.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -8.92% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -1.89% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -7.99% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.04% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XOEF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.23% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 10.18% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 12.88% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 17.49% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 18.29% | -5.53% |
XOEF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, which matches VTI's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.06% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and VTI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOEF has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to VTI (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEF dropped -7.66% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 19.88% vs 18.97% for XOEF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 19.88% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.
XOEF and VTI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.06%.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer