XOEF vs. VTI
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
XOEF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
XOEF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 13.92% | 4.15% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 9.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and VTI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
VTI
XOEF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.51 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -55.45% | +47.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.72% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -8.03% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.17% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 17.40% | -4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 18.30% | -5.68% |
XOEF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 0.79% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and VTI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.79% for XOEF.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer