XME vs. VUG
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 19.60%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for VUG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
XME vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 19.60%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.90% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
VUG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
XME vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.99% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and VUG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XME and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XME vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
VUG
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XME
VUG
Energy
XME
VUG
Technology
XME
VUG
Consumer Defensive
XME
VUG
Industrials
XME
VUG
Communication Services
XME
-
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
VUG
Financial Services
XME
-
VUG
Healthcare
XME
-
VUG
Real Estate
XME
-
VUG
Utilities
XME
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
XME
VUG
XME vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 1.29 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 4.43 | +5.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -50.68% | -35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -16.53% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -22.85% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -35.61% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -35.61% | -26.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -5.56% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.09% | -7.09% | -37.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.05% | 4.79% | +4.26% |
Volatility
XME vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.73%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 5.73% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.51% | 13.00% | +15.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 16.46% | +19.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 22.30% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.96% | 21.48% | +11.48% |
XME vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and VUG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to VUG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 17.90% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.03% for VUG.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer