PortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. PICK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XME and PICK is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

XME vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XME:

-0.16

PICK:

-0.56

Sortino Ratio

XME:

0.01

PICK:

-0.63

Omega Ratio

XME:

1.00

PICK:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

XME:

-0.12

PICK:

-0.43

Martin Ratio

XME:

-0.34

PICK:

-0.93

Ulcer Index

XME:

12.71%

PICK:

15.94%

Daily Std Dev

XME:

30.50%

PICK:

27.21%

Max Drawdown

XME:

-85.94%

PICK:

-68.87%

Current Drawdown

XME:

-20.76%

PICK:

-19.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed PICK with an annualized return of 9.46%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.25% annualized return.


XME

YTD

4.87%

1M

8.55%

6M

-8.41%

1Y

-4.85%

5Y*

27.10%

10Y*

9.46%

PICK

YTD

5.34%

1M

9.41%

6M

-2.23%

1Y

-15.20%

5Y*

17.28%

10Y*

6.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XME vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XME vs. PICK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XME is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XME is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XME is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XME is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XME is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XME is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PICK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PICK is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PICK is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PICK is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PICK is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PICK is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PICK is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XME vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XME Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and PICK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

XME vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than PICK's 3.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.56%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%2.21%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
3.09%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%2.88%

Drawdowns

XME vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.94%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XME vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 5.76%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...