PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. PICK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 22.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed PICK with an annualized return of 18.97%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively lower 17.20% annualized return.


XME

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
11.35%
6M
7.66%
1Y
76.71%
3Y*
34.03%
5Y*
23.02%
10Y*
18.97%

PICK

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
22.74%
6M
23.41%
1Y
79.31%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
17.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
11.35%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
22.74%51.89%-16.37%9.69%2.54%22.61%27.46%16.47%-18.65%38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and PICK is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.76

The correlation between XME and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
PICK

Basic Materials

76.3%
96.0%

Energy

22.5%
0.0%

Technology

2.2%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
0.1%

Industrials

0.4%
3.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XME
76.3%
PICK
96.0%

Energy

XME
22.5%
PICK
0.0%

Technology

XME
2.2%
PICK
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
PICK
0.1%

Industrials

XME
0.4%
PICK
3.1%

Communication Services

XME

-

PICK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

PICK

-

Financial Services

XME

-

PICK
0.1%

Healthcare

XME

-

PICK

-

Real Estate

XME

-

PICK

-

Utilities

XME

-

PICK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMEPICKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

4.08

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

15.49

-7.11

XME vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XME vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and PICK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEPICKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-68.87%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-19.54%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-32.52%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-36.37%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-52.72%

-8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.20%

-8.58%

-4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.06%

-24.06%

-20.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.19%

5.14%

+4.05%

Volatility

XME vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 12.41%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEPICKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.87%

12.41%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.09%

26.15%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.21%

29.84%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

28.07%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.93%

28.43%

+4.50%

XME vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than PICK's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.11%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.40%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and PICK have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to PICK (12.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs PICK's -68.87%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.97% vs 17.20% for PICK. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 12.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 17.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.40% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while PICK is Metals. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.39% for PICK.

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and PICK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer