XME vs. PICK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 14.85%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for PICK. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.

Performance

XME vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 16.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XME having a 14.85% annualized return and PICK not far ahead at 14.91%.

XME

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -4.26%
• 6M: -15.11%
• YTD: -2.73%
• 1Y: 39.51%
• 3Y*: 24.33%
• 5Y*: 18.53%
• 10Y*: 14.85%
• ALL TIME*: 5.47%

PICK

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 2.44%
• 6M: 2.29%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 1Y: 58.79%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 14.91%
• ALL TIME*: 5.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF	$52.34M	$45.18M	$51.90M
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	$205.06M	$204.83M	$245.34M

XME vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	-2.73%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	21.17%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF	16.18%	51.89%	-16.37%	9.69%	2.54%	22.61%	27.46%	16.47%	-18.65%	38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and PICK is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.76

The correlation between XME and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XME	PICK
Basic Materials	75.3%	97.1%
Energy	23.5%	0.5%
Technology	2.2%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	0.1%
Industrials	0.4%	1.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XME vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 39
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 34

PICK

PICK Risk / Return Rank: 77
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XME vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XME	PICK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.92	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.41	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.33	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	2.98	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.22	8.10	-4.88

XME vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XME vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and PICK.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	PICK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-68.87%	-17.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.49%	-19.54%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-32.52%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-36.37%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	-52.72%	-8.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.17%	-13.47%	-10.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-23.99%	-19.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.77%	7.17%	+4.60%

Volatility

XME vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 8.26%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	PICK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	8.26%	+2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.52%	26.71%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.88%	30.29%	+6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.70%	28.11%	+4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.88%	28.29%	+4.59%

XME vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XME vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than PICK's 2.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF	2.23%	2.88%	3.26%	4.19%	6.93%	5.89%	2.27%	5.51%	4.77%	2.41%	1.15%	15.77%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.37%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and PICK in my portfolio?

XME and PICK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or PICK?

XME has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to PICK (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs PICK's -68.87%.

Which ETF is better, XME or PICK?

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 14.91% vs 14.85% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XME or PICK?

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XME or PICK?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XME or PICK?

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.37% for XME.

What is the main difference between XME and PICK?

XME is categorized as Materials, while PICK is Metals. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.39% for PICK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.