XME vs. PICK
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 18.97%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for PICK. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
XME vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 22.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed PICK with an annualized return of 18.97%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively lower 17.20% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 76.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.02%
- 10Y*
- 18.97%
PICK
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 6M
- 23.41%
- 1Y
- 79.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
XME vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 11.35% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 22.74% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and PICK is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XME and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
XME vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
PICK
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XME
PICK
Energy
XME
PICK
Technology
XME
PICK
Consumer Defensive
XME
PICK
Industrials
XME
PICK
Communication Services
XME
-
PICK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
PICK
-
Financial Services
XME
-
PICK
Healthcare
XME
-
PICK
-
Real Estate
XME
-
PICK
-
Utilities
XME
-
PICK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
XME
PICK
XME vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.44 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 4.08 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 15.49 | -7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -68.87% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -19.54% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -32.52% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -36.37% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -52.72% | -8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.20% | -8.58% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.06% | -24.06% | -20.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 5.14% | +4.05% |
Volatility
XME vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 12.41%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.87% | 12.41% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 26.15% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.21% | 29.84% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.72% | 28.07% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 28.43% | +4.50% |
XME vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than PICK's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.11% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and PICK have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to PICK (12.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.97% vs 17.20% for PICK. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 12.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 17.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.40% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while PICK is Metals. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer