XME vs. SETM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM).
XME and SETM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XME is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. SETM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. Both XME and SETM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XME vs. SETM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XME vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 4.31% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 3.50% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 14.27% | 95.27% | -13.24% | -11.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than SETM's 14.27% return.
XME
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 93.75%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.54%
SETM
- 1D
- 5.82%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 137.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XME vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XME vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank
XME
SETM
XME vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XME | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 3.03 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 3.18 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 5.08 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 17.14 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XME | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 3.03 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.52 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and SETM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XME vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SETM's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.37% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XME vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and SETM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -42.81% | -43.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -25.85% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -16.74% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.45% | -14.59% | -29.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 7.67% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XME vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 11.55%, while Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 18.23%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XME | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 18.23% | -6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.02% | 36.72% | -8.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.81% | 45.92% | -10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 36.22% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 36.22% | -3.24% |