XME vs. VAW
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW).
XME and VAW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XME is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. VAW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both XME and VAW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XME or VAW.
Correlation
The correlation between XME and VAW is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XME vs. VAW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XME:
-0.00
VAW:
0.16
XME:
0.18
VAW:
0.31
XME:
1.02
VAW:
1.04
XME:
-0.00
VAW:
0.19
XME:
-0.01
VAW:
0.68
XME:
6.85%
VAW:
3.34%
XME:
25.71%
VAW:
14.56%
XME:
-85.94%
VAW:
-62.17%
XME:
-23.20%
VAW:
-11.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a -2.97% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 1.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XME having a 8.02% annualized return and VAW not far behind at 7.81%.
XME
-2.97%
-13.03%
-0.95%
-3.05%
16.54%
8.02%
VAW
1.03%
-7.76%
-2.36%
1.06%
9.28%
7.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XME vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XME vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XME vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VAW's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.53% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 1.32% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.23% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
XME vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.94%, which is greater than VAW's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and VAW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XME vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) at 4.72%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.