PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XME having a 18.64% annualized return and SPYG not far behind at 18.23%.


XME

1D
1.42%
1M
-11.28%
YTD
5.09%
6M
0.94%
1Y
66.55%
3Y*
31.16%
5Y*
21.46%
10Y*
18.64%

SPYG

1D
0.06%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
8.55%
6M
7.04%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
18.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
5.09%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.55%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and SPYG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.58

The correlation between XME and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
SPYG

Basic Materials

76.3%
0.3%

Energy

22.5%
0.1%

Technology

2.2%
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
1.0%

Industrials

0.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

-

15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Financial Services

-

9.0%

Healthcare

-

5.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Basic Materials

XME
76.3%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

XME
22.5%
SPYG
0.1%

Technology

XME
2.2%
SPYG
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
SPYG
1.0%

Industrials

XME
0.4%
SPYG
5.4%

Communication Services

XME

-

SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

SPYG
8.5%

Financial Services

XME

-

SPYG
9.0%

Healthcare

XME

-

SPYG
5.9%

Real Estate

XME

-

SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

XME

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMESPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.78

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

7.00

+0.11

XME vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XME vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMESPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-67.63%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-13.76%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-22.14%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-32.67%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-32.67%

-29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.08%

-5.65%

-12.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.04%

-24.28%

-19.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

3.49%

+5.90%

Volatility

XME vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.12%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMESPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.63%

7.12%

+6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.38%

13.84%

+14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

17.17%

+19.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.77%

21.36%

+11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.92%

20.72%

+12.20%

XME vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.34%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and SPYG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to SPYG (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.64% vs 18.23% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.64% return vs 18.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.34% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while SPYG is S&P 500. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.04% for SPYG.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer