PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. XLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -5.99% return.


XLY

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.76%
6M
-3.18%
YTD
-3.42%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
12.06%
ALL TIME*
9.55%

XLC

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.79%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
-5.99%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.42%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%-10.92%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.99%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and XLC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.75

The correlation between XLY and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLY vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
XLC

Consumer Cyclical

97.1%

-

Communication Services

1.8%
91.2%

Technology

1.0%
8.7%

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.1%
XLC

-

Communication Services

XLY
1.8%
XLC
91.2%

Technology

XLY
1.0%
XLC
8.7%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
XLC

-

Basic Materials

XLY

-

XLC

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

XLC

-

Energy

XLY

-

XLC

-

Financial Services

XLY

-

XLC

-

Healthcare

XLY

-

XLC

-

Real Estate

XLY

-

XLC

-

Utilities

XLY

-

XLC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.31

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

0.84

-0.13

XLY vs. XLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and XLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-46.65%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-11.57%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-17.97%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-46.65%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-7.84%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-10.55%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

4.22%

+1.05%

Volatility

XLY vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.32%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

11.11%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

13.95%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

20.79%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

22.13%

-0.03%

XLY vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLY and XLC have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLY vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than XLC's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.30%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.79%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and XLC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLC has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to XLY (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XLC's -46.65%.

On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 7.29% vs 5.68% for XLY. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY and XLC have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.79% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index.

XLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and XLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer