XLC vs. FCOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM).
XLC and FCOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XLC and FCOM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLC or FCOM.
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and FCOM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLC vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLC:
1.32
FCOM:
0.96
XLC:
1.83
FCOM:
1.41
XLC:
1.27
FCOM:
1.20
XLC:
1.43
FCOM:
0.95
XLC:
5.43
FCOM:
3.30
XLC:
4.73%
FCOM:
6.08%
XLC:
19.42%
FCOM:
20.87%
XLC:
-46.65%
FCOM:
-46.76%
XLC:
-7.00%
FCOM:
-10.34%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than FCOM's -2.05% return.
XLC
1.17%
11.95%
6.63%
23.12%
15.45%
N/A
FCOM
-2.05%
12.65%
2.96%
17.64%
12.81%
9.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLC vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FCOM's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLC vs. FCOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLC
FCOM
XLC vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLC vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than FCOM's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.06% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.94% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 7.54% | 2.25% | 2.92% | 2.69% |
Drawdowns
XLC vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FCOM drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and FCOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLC vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) have volatilities of 12.57% and 13.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.