XLC vs. FCOM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 7.11%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for FCOM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FCOM.

Performance

XLC vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -8.70% return, which is significantly lower than FCOM's -5.77% return.

XLC

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: -7.21%
• YTD: -8.70%
• 6M: -7.87%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: —

FCOM

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: -6.74%
• YTD: -5.77%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: 13.24%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	-8.70%	23.08%	34.71%	52.82%	-37.63%	15.96%	26.90%	31.05%	-16.45%
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	-5.77%	26.06%	33.05%	44.65%	-38.97%	13.88%	28.33%	26.69%	0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and FCOM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018	0.95

The correlation between XLC and FCOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLC vs. FCOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLC	FCOM
Communication Services	95.6%	98.0%
Technology	4.2%	1.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLC vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC

XLC Risk / Return Rank: 14
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FCOM

FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLC	FCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	0.84	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	1.29	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.16	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	0.99	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	3.50	-1.94

XLC vs. FCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FCOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and FCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLC vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FCOM drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and FCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLC	FCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.65%	-46.76%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-13.48%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.97%	-21.16%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.65%	-46.76%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.49%	-8.91%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-8.65%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.80%	-0.28%

Volatility

XLC vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 4.63%, while Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLC	FCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	5.56%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	11.87%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	15.79%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	21.27%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.18%	21.01%	+1.17%

XLC vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FCOM's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLC vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than FCOM's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	1.02%	0.88%	0.87%	0.77%	1.04%	0.90%	0.68%	0.86%	2.78%	11.70%	2.27%	2.92%
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	1.34%	1.13%	0.99%	0.82%	1.10%	0.74%	0.68%	0.82%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLC and FCOM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, XLC and FCOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XLC or FCOM?

FCOM has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to XLC (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs FCOM's -46.76%.

Which ETF is better, XLC or FCOM?

On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 7.11% vs 6.01% for FCOM. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLC or FCOM?

Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLC or FCOM?

FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLC or FCOM?

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.02% for FCOM.

What is the main difference between XLC and FCOM?

XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while FCOM is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.08% for FCOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.