XLC vs. SPY
XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 7.11%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
XLC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -8.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return.
XLC
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -7.87%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XLC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -8.70% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -8.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and SPY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XLC and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLC vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLC
SPY
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
XLC
SPY
Technology
XLC
SPY
Basic Materials
XLC
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
XLC
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
XLC
-
SPY
Energy
XLC
-
SPY
Financial Services
XLC
-
SPY
Healthcare
XLC
-
SPY
Industrials
XLC
-
SPY
Real Estate
XLC
-
SPY
Utilities
XLC
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
XLC
SPY
XLC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 3.01 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 13.54 | -11.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -55.19% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -8.88% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.97% | -18.76% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.65% | -24.50% | -22.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.49% | -1.75% | -8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -9.04% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 1.97% | +1.55% |
Volatility
XLC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 9.75% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 12.43% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 17.14% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 17.99% | +4.19% |
XLC vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLC and SPY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to XLC (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs 7.11% for XLC. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLC and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer