PortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and XLF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XLC vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLC:

1.23

XLF:

1.14

Sortino Ratio

XLC:

1.63

XLF:

1.48

Omega Ratio

XLC:

1.24

XLF:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

XLC:

1.25

XLF:

1.32

Martin Ratio

XLC:

4.60

XLF:

5.10

Ulcer Index

XLC:

4.88%

XLF:

4.02%

Daily Std Dev

XLC:

19.50%

XLF:

20.36%

Max Drawdown

XLC:

-46.65%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

XLC:

-4.58%

XLF:

-3.75%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLC having a 3.80% return and XLF slightly higher at 3.93%.


XLC

YTD

3.80%

1M

6.18%

6M

3.46%

1Y

22.15%

3Y*

22.05%

5Y*

14.32%

10Y*

N/A

XLF

YTD

3.93%

1M

4.23%

6M

-1.20%

1Y

22.16%

3Y*

15.95%

5Y*

20.18%

10Y*

14.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLC vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLC and XLF have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLC vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLC is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLC is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLC is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLC is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLC is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLC vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

XLC vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XLF's 1.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.03%0.99%0.82%1.11%0.74%0.68%0.81%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.42%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

XLC vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and XLF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

XLC vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.07%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...