XLC vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLC and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both XLC and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLC or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and XLF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLC vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLC:
1.26
XLF:
1.16
XLC:
1.75
XLF:
1.66
XLC:
1.26
XLF:
1.24
XLC:
1.36
XLF:
1.51
XLC:
5.14
XLF:
5.77
XLC:
4.75%
XLF:
4.05%
XLC:
19.38%
XLF:
20.25%
XLC:
-46.65%
XLF:
-82.43%
XLC:
-7.02%
XLF:
-5.46%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 2.09% return.
XLC
1.15%
11.92%
5.44%
21.44%
15.01%
N/A
XLF
2.09%
11.22%
6.08%
21.56%
19.94%
13.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLC vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLC and XLF have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLC vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLC
XLF
XLC vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLC vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than XLF's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.06% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
XLC vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLC vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 9.52%. This indicates that XLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.