XLY vs. SFYF
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLY returned 7.39%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for SFYF. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SFYF.
Performance
XLY vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than SFYF's 14.80% return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
SFYF
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 44.18%
- 3Y*
- 36.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -1.60% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 7.73% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 14.80% | 30.00% | 44.62% | 56.80% | -47.73% | 35.83% | 33.65% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and SFYF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XLY and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLY vs. SFYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
SFYF
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
SFYF
Communication Services
XLY
SFYF
Technology
XLY
SFYF
Industrials
XLY
SFYF
Basic Materials
XLY
-
SFYF
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
SFYF
Energy
XLY
-
SFYF
Financial Services
XLY
-
SFYF
Healthcare
XLY
-
SFYF
Real Estate
XLY
-
SFYF
Utilities
XLY
-
SFYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
SFYF
XLY vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLY | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 2.93 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 9.71 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLY | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.37 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XLY vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and SFYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -56.09% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -15.18% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -26.45% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -56.09% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -1.72% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -16.57% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 4.57% | +0.19% |
Volatility
XLY vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 5.17%, while SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 5.60% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 13.20% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 18.73% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 29.28% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 30.67% | -8.62% |
XLY vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SFYF's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and SFYF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFYF has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to XLY (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs SFYF's -56.09%.
On 5-year performance, SFYF leads with 12.33% vs 7.39% for XLY. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.
XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.29% for SFYF.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and SFYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer