PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. SFYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than SFYF's 14.80% return.


XLY

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
12.63%

SFYF

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.49%
YTD
14.80%
6M
13.77%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
36.16%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-1.60%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%7.73%
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
14.80%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and SFYF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.83

The correlation between XLY and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLY vs. SFYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
SFYF

Consumer Cyclical

97.5%
22.9%

Communication Services

1.4%
13.8%

Technology

0.9%
38.5%

Industrials

0.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

6.8%

Energy

-

2.1%

Financial Services

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.5%
SFYF
22.9%

Communication Services

XLY
1.4%
SFYF
13.8%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
SFYF
38.5%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
SFYF
3.5%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

SFYF

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

SFYF
6.8%

Energy

XLY

-

SFYF
2.1%

Financial Services

XLY

-

SFYF
5.5%

Healthcare

XLY

-

SFYF
5.5%

Real Estate

XLY

-

SFYF
1.2%

Utilities

XLY

-

SFYF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYSFYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.40

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.93

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

9.71

-7.60

XLY vs. SFYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SFYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and SFYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYSFYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.37

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.42

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.61

-0.19

Drawdowns

XLY vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and SFYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYSFYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-56.09%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-15.18%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-26.45%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-56.09%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.72%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-16.57%

+7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

4.57%

+0.19%

Volatility

XLY vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 5.17%, while SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYSFYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.60%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

13.20%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

18.73%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

29.28%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

30.67%

-8.62%

XLY vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SFYF's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.29%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.76%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and SFYF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFYF has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to XLY (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs SFYF's -56.09%.

On 5-year performance, SFYF leads with 12.33% vs 7.39% for XLY. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.29% for SFYF.

SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and SFYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer