SFYF vs. VTI
SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFYF returned 12.46%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
SFYF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return.
SFYF
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 46.49%
- 3Y*
- 36.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
SFYF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 15.84% | 30.00% | 44.62% | 56.80% | -47.73% | 35.83% | 33.65% | 4.95% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYF and VTI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SFYF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFYF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFYF
VTI
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SFYF
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
SFYF
VTI
Communication Services
SFYF
VTI
Consumer Defensive
SFYF
VTI
Financial Services
SFYF
VTI
Healthcare
SFYF
VTI
Industrials
SFYF
VTI
Energy
SFYF
VTI
Real Estate
SFYF
VTI
Basic Materials
SFYF
-
VTI
Utilities
SFYF
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
SFYF
VTI
SFYF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFYF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.48 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 3.37 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 3.44 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 15.88 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFYF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.75 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.51 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SFYF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.09% | -55.45% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.18% | -8.92% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | -19.30% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.09% | -25.36% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | 0.00% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -8.03% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 1.93% | +2.64% |
Volatility
SFYF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 2.86% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 9.11% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 12.15% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 17.40% | +12.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 18.30% | +12.39% |
SFYF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYF and VTI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFYF has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 13.05% vs 12.46% for SFYF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.
SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.03% for VTI.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFYF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer