PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYF vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


SFYF

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.58%
YTD
15.84%
6M
15.98%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
36.71%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
15.84%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%4.95%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and VOO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.82

The correlation between SFYF and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFYF vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYF
VOO

Technology

38.5%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
10.2%

Communication Services

13.8%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.9%

Financial Services

5.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.5%

Industrials

3.5%
8.3%

Energy

2.1%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

SFYF
38.5%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
22.9%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

SFYF
13.8%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
6.8%
VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

SFYF
5.5%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

SFYF
5.5%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

SFYF
3.5%
VOO
8.3%

Energy

SFYF
2.1%
VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

SFYF
1.2%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

VOO
1.8%

Utilities

SFYF

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYFVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.39

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.25

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.16

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.30

14.73

-4.43

SFYF vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYFVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.39

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.89

-0.27

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYFVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

-33.99%

-22.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-8.90%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-18.69%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-24.52%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.70%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-3.69%

-12.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

1.91%

+2.66%

Volatility

SFYF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYFVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.84%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

8.90%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

11.80%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

16.81%

+12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.69%

18.01%

+12.68%

SFYF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.29%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYF and VOO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFYF has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 12.46% for SFYF. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.03% for VOO.

SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer