PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -4.35% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 12.73%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.


XLY

1D
-1.03%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-4.35%
6M
-6.51%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
12.73%

ENFR

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
24.93%
6M
25.03%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-4.35%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.93%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and ENFR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.38

The correlation between XLY and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLY vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
ENFR

Consumer Cyclical

97.3%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Technology

0.9%

-

Industrials

0.1%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

98.5%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.3%
ENFR

-

Communication Services

XLY
1.5%
ENFR

-

Technology

XLY
0.9%
ENFR

-

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
ENFR
3.4%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

ENFR

-

Energy

XLY

-

ENFR
98.5%

Financial Services

XLY

-

ENFR
0.1%

Healthcare

XLY

-

ENFR

-

Real Estate

XLY

-

ENFR

-

Utilities

XLY

-

ENFR
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

3.23

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

8.24

-6.84

XLY vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-68.28%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-8.64%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-15.58%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-20.29%

-19.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-62.64%

+22.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.28%

-4.71%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-15.94%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

3.38%

+1.59%

Volatility

XLY vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.69%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

5.69%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

11.60%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

14.86%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.91%

19.25%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

24.68%

-2.59%

XLY vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.79%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and ENFR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to ENFR (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.73% vs 11.98% for ENFR. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.79% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer