PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENFR vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ENFR vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ENFR vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
22.85%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
14.20%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 22.85% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 13.64%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


ENFR

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.03%
YTD
22.85%
6M
20.70%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
23.59%
10Y*
13.64%

AMLP

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
14.20%
6M
16.89%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ENFR vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ENFR vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENFRAMLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

0.62

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

0.89

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

0.68

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.94

1.72

+3.22

ENFR vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and AMLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENFRAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.62

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

1.02

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.31

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.22

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and AMLP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ENFR vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than AMLP's 7.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.54%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and AMLP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ENFRAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-77.19%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-14.27%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-20.92%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

-72.62%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-2.17%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-17.57%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

5.60%

-1.13%

Volatility

ENFR vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 2.92%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ENFRAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.92%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

7.86%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

16.08%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

20.18%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

27.84%

-3.10%