ENFR vs. ATMP
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP).
ENFR and ATMP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. Both ENFR and ATMP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENFR or ATMP.
Key characteristics
| ENFR | ATMP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 39.38% | 36.15% |
| 1Y Return | 44.25% | 38.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.61% | 25.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.45% | 20.23% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.71% | 6.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.59 | 3.01 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.90 | 4.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.48 | 5.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 29.81 | 19.43 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.55% | 2.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.87% | 13.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.28% | -72.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.37% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and ATMP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ENFR vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 39.38% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 36.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has underperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 5.71%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENFR vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENFR vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENFR vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than ATMP's 4.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.32% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% | 0.26% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.59% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -72.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and ATMP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENFR vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.