ENFR vs. ATMP
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.81%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for ATMP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
ENFR vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 18.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 11.81%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
ENFR vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 18.11% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and ATMP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ENFR and ATMP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
ATMP
ENFR vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.09 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 5.25 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -80.86% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.30% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -16.48% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -22.98% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -75.66% | +13.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | -7.56% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -31.04% | +15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.30% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 5.25% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 10.97% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 14.27% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 22.11% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 27.68% | -3.00% |
ENFR vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ENFR and ATMP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to ATMP (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.81% vs 4.66% for ATMP. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ATMP has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while ATMP is MLPs. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.95% for ATMP.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer