PortfoliosLab logo
ENFR vs. UMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and UMI is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

ENFR vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
116.47%
148.83%
ENFR
UMI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ENFR:

1.55

UMI:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

ENFR:

1.95

UMI:

1.84

Omega Ratio

ENFR:

1.29

UMI:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

ENFR:

1.96

UMI:

1.73

Martin Ratio

ENFR:

7.55

UMI:

6.44

Ulcer Index

ENFR:

4.04%

UMI:

4.59%

Daily Std Dev

ENFR:

19.65%

UMI:

20.28%

Max Drawdown

ENFR:

-68.28%

UMI:

-48.08%

Current Drawdown

ENFR:

-6.72%

UMI:

-8.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 1.11% return.


ENFR

YTD

2.18%

1M

-5.29%

6M

8.84%

1Y

29.23%

5Y*

28.04%

10Y*

6.28%

UMI

YTD

1.11%

1M

-5.36%

6M

7.72%

1Y

28.15%

5Y*

27.65%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ENFR vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
UMI: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for ENFR: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ENFR: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ENFR vs. UMI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENFR is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENFR is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENFR is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENFR is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENFR is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENFR is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMI is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMI is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMI is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMI is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMI is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMI is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ENFR vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
ENFR: 1.55
UMI: 1.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
ENFR: 1.95
UMI: 1.84
The chart of Omega ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
ENFR: 1.29
UMI: 1.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
ENFR: 1.96
UMI: 1.73
The chart of Martin ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 7.55, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
ENFR: 7.55
UMI: 6.44

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and UMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.55
1.46
ENFR
UMI

Dividends

ENFR vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than UMI's 3.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.40%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%2.15%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
3.92%4.39%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and UMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-6.72%
-8.48%
ENFR
UMI

Volatility

ENFR vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) have volatilities of 12.72% and 13.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.72%
13.02%
ENFR
UMI