ENFR vs. UMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI).
ENFR and UMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENFR or UMI.
Key characteristics
| ENFR | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 39.38% | 42.46% |
| 1Y Return | 44.25% | 46.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.61% | 23.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.45% | 17.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.59 | 3.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.90 | 5.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.66 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.48 | 8.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 29.81 | 30.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.55% | 1.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.87% | 12.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.28% | -48.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.37% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and UMI is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ENFR vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 39.38% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 42.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENFR vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENFR vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENFR vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than UMI's 3.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.32% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% | 0.26% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 3.99% | 4.67% | 4.78% | 3.37% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and UMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENFR vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.