PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. EMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. EMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than EMR's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 12.78%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


XLY

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.78%

EMR

1D
0.69%
1M
4.18%
YTD
8.65%
6M
5.53%
1Y
15.82%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. EMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.16%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
8.65%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and EMR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.57

The correlation between XLY and EMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. EMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYEMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.63

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

1.37

+0.68

XLY vs. EMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the EMR Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and EMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EMR drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and EMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYEMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-59.05%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-23.45%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-29.62%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-29.62%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-50.77%

+11.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-10.82%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-14.11%

+4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

10.79%

-5.91%

Volatility

XLY vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 6.19%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYEMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

9.08%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

25.24%

-11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

30.47%

-12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

27.36%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

29.14%

-7.06%

Dividends

XLY vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than EMR's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.53%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and EMR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMR has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to XLY (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs EMR's -59.05%.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and EMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer