EMR vs. FAST

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than FAST's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed FAST with an annualized return of 9.01%, while FAST has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Fastenal Company (FAST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FAST Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and FAST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than FAST's 2.04% yield.

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum FAST drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and FAST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 18.80% compared to Fastenal Company (FAST) at 12.53%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and Fastenal Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.