EMR vs. EME

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than EME's -9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 9.01%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 24.83% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than EME's 0.24% yield.

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and EME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 18.80% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 17.64%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.