EMR vs. MMM

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's 6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 9.01%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and MMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than MMM's 2.06% yield.

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum MMM drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and 3M Company (MMM) have volatilities of 18.80% and 18.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.